This morning, when I read Dan Peterson's post "Objective Public Proof," I bookmarked it. It is very well done if, as Dan says, he just dashed it off. Dan wrote a fitting tribute to Hellenism. Then, this afternoon, I got your post, "The Credibility of Love." Your piece is a tribute to Hebraeism and the perfect bookend to Dan's post. It cannot be a coincidence that both appeared in the same day. God lives. I see His hand every time the metaphorical flipped coin stands on edge!
Thank you ever so much for bringing my heart the phrase someone else coined, the “why-lessness of love” and for expounding on that. What a gift to me today.
This morning, when I read Dan Peterson's post "Objective Public Proof," I bookmarked it. It is very well done if, as Dan says, he just dashed it off. Dan wrote a fitting tribute to Hellenism. Then, this afternoon, I got your post, "The Credibility of Love." Your piece is a tribute to Hebraeism and the perfect bookend to Dan's post. It cannot be a coincidence that both appeared in the same day. God lives. I see His hand every time the metaphorical flipped coin stands on edge!
Thank you, Terryl, for taking the part of love!
Dan's post: https://www.patheos.com/blogs/danpeterson/2024/03/objective-public-proof.html
Thank you ever so much for bringing my heart the phrase someone else coined, the “why-lessness of love” and for expounding on that. What a gift to me today.