Wayfare

Wayfare

Share this post

Wayfare
Wayfare
Latter-day Saints Can Save America

Latter-day Saints Can Save America

Jonathan Rauch's avatar
Jonathan Rauch
Jun 30, 2025
∙ Paid

Share this post

Wayfare
Wayfare
Latter-day Saints Can Save America
Share

In November 2021, an elderly man, thin and with a dignified demeanor leavened by an impish smile, traveled from Salt Lake City to the University of Virginia with an urgent message. Wasting little time on pleasantries, he launched straight into his theme. “I love this country, which I believe was established with the blessings of God. I love its Constitution, whose principles I believe were divinely inspired. I am, therefore, distressed at the way we are handling the national issues that divide us.”

In expressing his distress, he was not speaking merely for himself. This was Dallin Oaks, first counselor in the First Presidency of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Then almost 90, he had been a successful lawyer, a justice of the Utah state supreme court, and president of Brigham Young University. Called to the First Presidency in 2018, he was next in line to succeed Russell M. Nelson, the church’s president and prophet; and he had become the public voice of the church’s civic theology.

A civic theology posits that God expects his people to act in certain ways, and to follow his commandments, not only in our personal lives but in our civic lives. In that respect, it operates in the same space as Christian nationalism—though what Oaks proposed was antithetical to Christian nationalism and far more profound and promising. When I first read the text of his speech, I felt a frisson. Here was something I had been looking for in my own advocacy of religious liberty and liberal pluralism because it elegantly linked the two.

Oaks’s brief began where James Madison and the U.S. Constitution also begin: with the inescapable reality of disagreement and faction. “We have always had to work through serious political conflicts,” Oaks said, “but today too many approach that task as if their preferred outcome must entirely prevail over all others, even in our pluralistic society. We need to work for a better way—a way to resolve differences without compromising core values.”

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to Wayfare to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
A guest post by
Jonathan Rauch
Senior Fellow, Brookings Institution; contributing writer, The Atlantic
Subscribe to Jonathan
© 2025 Faith Matters
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share